Home Opinion Macron: Lessons for Nigeria

Macron: Lessons for Nigeria

A political phenomenon which is compared to the French revolution headed by the irrepressible General Napoleon Bonaparte has just happened in France thus reinforcing the strong doubts i do have about the expression that lightening  doesn't strike twice in one place.

French President, Emmanuel Macron

By Emmanuel Onwubiko


A political phenomenon which is compared to the French revolution headed by the irrepressible General Napoleon Bonaparte has just happened in France thus reinforcing the strong doubts i do have about the expression that lightening  doesn’t strike twice in one place.

This phenomenal political revolution devoid of violence or rancour that I’m talking about is the 2017 French presidential election which culminated in the emergence of the 39-year old Mr. Emmanuel Macron as the winner by a decisive margin.

The independent centrist Macron reportedly  scored 60.3 percent of the votes while his rival; Marine Le Pen got 39.7 percent.

In the emergence of this young but upwardly mobile politician, political lightning has struck twice and in fact the symbolism of his election after such a tensed political atmospherics  has wider ramifications not just for France but the European Union and the global community.

Just before the second round of the Presidential poll took place, the electoral commission of France alerted the World of frenetic effort made by some hackers with suspicious links to Kremlin in Russia to hack into the campaign systems of Emmanuel Macron With the overall objective of interfering to influence the outcomes of the election.

The hackers succeeded but the quick intervention of the Electoral umpires to stop the French media from circulating the private and campaign emails hacked from the party office of Emmanuel Macron contributed in no small way to ensure that there was level playing field for both candidates.

Macron who is a strong supporter of European Union is an opponent of Russian President Mr. Putin who had invaded Ukraine and annexed a large chunk of that sovereign state in an attempt to stop the European Union and North Atlantic Treaty Organisation from gaining in-road to Russian Federation through Ukraine.  European Union is on the side of Ukraine in the ongoing civil war with Russia.

On the other hand Ms. Marine LePen is opposed to EU and therefore is seen as the favourite of Mr. Putin who is pleased to see EU disintegrate.

The victory of Emmanuel Macron is viewed as victory for a united Europe and indeed the German Chancellor Angela Merkel who is soon to undergo political baptism of fire in the soon to be conducted German election heaved a sense of relief upon learning that French voters have rejected far right candidate who hates European Union passionately.

In the United Kingdom the Prime minister Mrs. Theresa May who has called for a snap national poll in June is happy with the outcome because she anchored her Conservative party’s campaign on seeking for strong mandate to be able to negotiate fairly with the European Union over the Brexit.

If LePen had won, the negotiations between UK and EU wouldn’t have been easy because the whole of Europe would have heaped the blame for the eventual exit of France from EU on the British voters. Thankfully, the French voters have decided to remain in the European Union.  Theresa May has already congratulated both Emmanuel Macron and the French voters for their choice.

Before analysing the implicit import of this French electoral revolution of 2017 it would be nice to refresh our minds with the fascinating story of the much talked about Napoleon Bonaparte so as to more appropriately position this emerging World leader Emmanuel Macron in his right place of historical honour and to clearly underscore the implied significance especially to Nigerians and Africans where by sit-tight rulership has destroyed the economic and democratic credentials of our Continent and has made Africa a laughing stock in the comity of nations.

Countries such as Zimbabwe, Equatorial Guinea; Cameroon; Chad,  Congo-Kinshasha and Uganda still have political dictators who seized power even whilst Emmanuel Macron was a two year old.

But let’s review just a few historical events that characterized the Napoleonic era so as to reassert the correlationship with the contemporary French Political tsunami that has just brought in the Young Emmanuel Macron who only formed his Centrist Socialist Party last year.

In seeking verifiable information about this great French political statesman of all times we have to consult the authoritative website known as www.biography.com.

In this great work of scholarship we learnt that the Military general and first emperor of France, Napoleon Bonaparte was born on August 15, 1769, in Ajaccio, Corsica, France.

These writers stated that Bonaparte remains One of the most celebrated leaders in the history of the West, and that he revolutionized military organization and training, sponsored Napoleonic Code, reorganized education and established the long-lived Concordat with the papacy.

He died on May 5, 1821, on the island of St. Helena in the South Atlantic Ocean.

Before his emergence France had witnessed tumultuous times and high profile executions.

But the comparisons of  Bonaparte and Emmanuel Macrons ends not only with the historical significance that he is the youngest President elect since after Bonaparte.

The contemporary challenges posed by mass poverty of the urban youthful populations and the incursions into France of extreme Islamic fundamentalism can be situated side-by- side with the internal political crises and schisms that unleashed themselves that resulted in the military take over of political power by this ambitious General Napoleon Bonaparte.

As stated, the other existential nexus with the era of Bonaparte and Emmanuel Macron’s epoch is that whereas France faced internal political squabbles and instability leading to the emergence of the military General Napoleon Bonaparte to the coveted political office as the Leader of France, France right now is awash with situations of near anarchy created by the fear of terrorists.

For some few years now France has witnessed major terror attacks from Islamists loyal to the Islamic State of Syria and Iraq led by AlBagdadi.

Several law enforcement agents and journalists have met their violent deaths in the hands of these armed Islamic terrorists made up largely of home grown terror agents who became radicalized from the decrepit prisin walls of France or through the World Wide Websites of radical Islamic terror masterminds.

A newspaper house in Paris which carried a cartoon of the founder of the Moslem religion and its holiest Prophet  was bombed even as dozens of journalists were killed.

A Catholic Priest was attacked by a lone wolf and slaughtered at the altar whilst distributing  Holy communion to congregants somewhere in France.

A night club was bombed in France by Islamists resulting in the mass genocide of nearly 200 people clubbing at the center of social life in Paris.

President Francois Hollande the outgoing French President was almost killed in one of these high profile terror attacks when some suicide bombers nearly invaded the National Stadium in Paris France during an International friendly between France and another European national team.

Again, France just like other European nations is witnessing a serious pressure to get the European Union disintegrate since after the United kingdom voted to exit the European Union.

Marine Le Pen the other opponent in the second and last round of the Presidential election had played actively on the growing agitation for the dissolution of the European Union.

She secured over 30 percent of  the votes in the final poll showing that France is gravely divided ideologically and that millions of citizens still believe in the ideology of exiting European Union as campaigned by Marine LaPen.

But the far-right La Pen who had since congratulated the president elect, expressed appreciation to her supporters and promised to “lead the fight” in the France’s parliamentary elections next month.

Le Pen also pledged a “profound reform” of her Front National party to create ‘a new political force.

The media reported that although it was not clear what she meant by this, rumours in the media as reported are rife that the defeated presidential candidate may be planning to disband the party and build a new movement, aiming to organise “a major political reorganisation around the divide between patriots and globalists”.

But the media analyses of the French election also shows that the winner of this epochal election doesn’t have any politically elected  office background.

This is how the media presented the emergence of Emmanuel Macron thus: “With his victory, Macron becomes France’s youngest president and has pulled off a remarkable feat. He has never held elected office, and just over a year ago his political movement En Marche did not even exist.”

“His rival, the far right leader Le Pen, has brought her France-first, anti-EU Front National party a long way. According to information from French state TV and radio monitored by The Guardian, the turnout projection of 74 percent is the lowest in the second round of a French presidential election since 1969.”

“This is not unexpected in a contest as unique as that between the independent centrist Macron and far-right Le Pen, neither of whom have the formal backing of a mainstream political group, say analysts. Supporters of LePen however interpreted the election victory of Macron as a vote for continuity.

Media observers say the outcome matters not just because France is the world’s sixth biggest economy and a key member of the EU, Nato and the UN Security Council, but also because the two candidates’ worldviews could not be more different.

Pollsters have predicted since the first round on April 23 that Emmanuel Macron, a centrist, former banker and economy minister, would win comfortably, possibly by more than 20 percentage points, and at 39 become France’s youngest ever leader.

He is economically liberal, socially progressive, globally minded and – on the whole – optimistic. Le Pen, of the far-right Front National, is a nation-first protectionist who wants to close France’s borders and abandon the euro and EU.

For us in Nigeria and the African continent, the emergence of Emmanuel Macron should teach us a lesson to mainstream the active participation of young persons in politics in the electoral legal frameworks so our nations can benefit from the academic prowess of thousands of Nigerian youngsters scattered all over the planet.

Same with much of African nations. For instance some scholars have already factored in the issue of academic sophistication of France and the French people as the fundamental reason for the actualization of this kind of political revolution whereby a young man with no previous electoral experience was able to form his political party and galvanize supports of mostly the young which has in less than a year displaced all the entrenched political camps and dynasties including the defeat of Marine LePen whose father was an ideologue in the French far-right.

“To get the import of Emmanuel Macron’s victory at the polls you MUST understand the socio-political social formation that made the victory possible in the first place…France is  the bedrock of the Enlightenment Movement that spread through Western Europe.

The Enlightenment inspired intellectual, philosophical, cultural and social movements across the globe. The ideas and principles of the Enlightenment have continued to affect French politics, culture and social lives. Thus, Macron’s victory too has strong root in the Enlightenment.”



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here